The New York Post

I'm guardedly optimistic. (But only three sentences in the whole article? Sheesh, I could have been a reporter.)

I'd love to see it, but I don't think the majority of celebrities are classy or "serious" enough to play the game well.

I'm not so confident this format can work today.

Add me to 'cautiously optimistic,' though. It could be good.

I don't think the '00s versions of 'To Tell The Truth' and 'Secret' turned out bad so I say it can be properly done.

When did the rights shift to Fremantle? I thought CBS held the rights.

And isn't this the third time this decade this has been reported, only to see nothing in return? I'll believe this one when I see it.

That is true, but WML is much more formal than either Truth or Secret, especially in their latest incarnations. WML done for laughs would pretty much be Secret, so the formality really does have to stay, I'd think.

If J. Keith is hosting, I'm in the tent.

I thought that only happened when you're around Anitra?

No, no. Then I'm in the tree, remember?
Was she ever on the WML? panel during the Bruner/Blyden era?

What Don said. J. Keith isn't a big name, but he does a darn good job at it.

Brandon, when Anitra's around, he's pitching a tent. ;-)

How much is each "no" answer going to be worth? $500 each (or $5,000 for all 10) wouldn't be so bad these days, and it would keep the game for fun only, like the original version.

The first will be worth $10,000, awarded after a commercial break-long reveal while we wait to find out if "Is it bigger than a bread box?" can be answered with a no. The next eight will be of increasing value going all the way to $500,000. The final is worth $1,000,000, but you have to risk going back to $25,000 to try for the big money.

If they have any sense at all, they'll play the game for no money, the way they did in the seventies.

If they have any sense of fun at all, they'll play it for the same stakes they did in the fifties, just for a laugh.

And there's one lingering problem here--the source for all this is the New York Post. I'd rather trust a diagnosis from Dr. Woo Woo than I would the Post.

Do you think Hasselhoff wasn't interviewed on WABC and didn't talk about WML, that the entire report is a fabrication?

Hasselhoff still has an image problem if you ask me:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH3JAp7vMuo

From the Museum of Broadcast Communications:


http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/G/htmlG/...goodsonmark.htm

I have never heard that Goodson/Fremantle reacquired WML?, so I'm with Modor on this. They may think they own it because it used to be produced by G-T but the Goodsons or the Todmans haven't owned it since 1958. I thought this was common knowledge. Calling Roy Blakeman!