Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: A Mission For Drew
Game Show Forum > Discussion Boards > The Big Board
PartingGift
I think Drew Carey should go on a $50,000 Plinko mission. Every time someone plays Plinko and doesn't win $50,000, Drew should add another $10,000 slot to the board. Wouldn't this be exciting? You bet it would!
Modor
QUOTE(PartingGift @ Jan 24 2008, 08:48 AM) [snapback]176086[/snapback]

I think Drew Carey should go on a $50,000 Plinko mission. Every time someone plays Plinko and doesn't win $50,000, Drew should add another $10,000 slot to the board. Wouldn't this be exciting? You bet it would!
Exactly why would this be a good idea? How dull would it be if you knew in advance that some one would win $50,000?

The "fun" in Plinko comes from chips hovering around the $10,000 spot, and not knowing if it will hit the big space, or a zero. YMMV.
Steve Gavazzi
Mark, I think you need some new batteries in your Klauss-Gibson.
Hastin
Time to pull this one out again...

http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/3211/matmonbag2ec0.gif
DoorNumberFour
QUOTE(Hastin @ Jan 24 2008, 12:38 PM) [snapback]176108[/snapback]

Dude.
clemon79
QUOTE(Steve Gavazzi @ Jan 24 2008, 09:08 AM) [snapback]176102[/snapback]

Mark, I think you need some new batteries in your Klauss-Gibson.

Mine must be on the fritz too. I honestly couldn't tell if that was sarcasm or not.

(It's a sad state of affairs around here that I have to actually entertain the notion that it wasn't.)
TenPoundHammer
QUOTE(PartingGift @ Jan 24 2008, 08:48 AM) [snapback]176086[/snapback]

I think Drew Carey should go on a $50,000 Plinko mission. Every time someone plays Plinko and doesn't win $50,000, Drew should add another $10,000 slot to the board. Wouldn't this be exciting? You bet it would!


No it wouldn't. The real excitement of Plinko is seeing that chip wobble its way down and balancing on the edge of the $10K slot. Multiply that by 5 chips and you have one hell of a Plinko game. Let's not go the DoND route here.
rigsby
QUOTE(clemon79 @ Jan 24 2008, 12:13 PM) [snapback]176114[/snapback]
Mine must be on the fritz too. I honestly couldn't tell if that was sarcasm or not.
Mine was going off until I checked the OP's post history. Now I'm not so sure.

Now as for me, I'm holding out for Alex changing all of the clue values on J! to $2000, one at a time, until that Ken Jennings record is beaten. (Which record? Pick one!)
MikeK
QUOTE(DoorNumberFour @ Jan 24 2008, 12:42 PM) [snapback]176109[/snapback]
Dude.

Do you mind adding something else to your arsenal besides "Dude" and that incredibly stupid picture of Tommy Oliver in his drawers? Creativity's not a bad thing.

Me? I got a ton of sarcasm detectors for sale and I have a quota to reach by the end of the month.
PYLdude
QUOTE(MikeK @ Jan 24 2008, 03:21 PM) [snapback]176136[/snapback]

I got a ton of sarcasm detectors for sale and I have a quota to reach by the end of the month.


I'll take it! I'll take twelve!
tvwxman
QUOTE(PYLdude @ Jan 24 2008, 03:24 PM) [snapback]176138[/snapback]

I'll take it! I'll take twelve!

I'll take eleventy.

/Parting Gift is a troll
TLEberle
QUOTE(tvwxman @ Jan 24 2008, 12:51 PM) [snapback]176143[/snapback]
/Parting Gift is a troll
Anyone who doesn't believe WeatherMatt needs only to look at PartingGift's storied history here, and he'd come to the same conclusion. After all, what sane person would campaign for a "best of Pat and Vanna end-of-show chatter"?

But I did have to look, just to be sure.

/And if you don't believe WeatherMatt, well, why not?
clemon79
The thing is, "troll" implies intent. I don't think this guy is trying to stir up the shiat for its own sake.

So "troll" isn't the word I would use.
CX360
The moment I read this, I instantly laughed out loud.
Steve Gavazzi
QUOTE(TLEberle @ Jan 24 2008, 08:47 PM) [snapback]176174[/snapback]
QUOTE(tvwxman @ Jan 24 2008, 12:51 PM) [snapback]176143[/snapback]
/Parting Gift is a troll
Anyone who doesn't believe WeatherMatt needs only to look at PartingGift's storied history here, and he'd come to the same conclusion. After all, what sane person would campaign for a "best of Pat and Vanna end-of-show chatter"?

But I did have to look, just to be sure.

/And if you don't believe WeatherMatt, well, why not?

Hm. That's a darn shame, because if you just read the comment and assume it's not meant seriously, it's pretty dang funny.
tyshaun1
QUOTE(Steve Gavazzi @ Jan 24 2008, 11:27 PM) [snapback]176192[/snapback]

Hm. That's a darn shame, because if you just read the comment and assume it's not meant seriously, it's pretty dang funny.


Sadly, I drew (no pun intended) the same conclusion because Mark made the first reply.

Tyshaun
chris319
QUOTE
if you just read the comment and assume it's not meant seriously, it's pretty dang funny.

I'm not laughing.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.