IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Family Feud, 10/27/09 show
Twentington
post Nov 6 2009, 06:55 PM
Post #15


Custom member title


Group: Members
Posts: 266
Joined: 27-March 09
From: Michigan
Member No.: 17205



QUOTE (wheelloon @ Nov 6 2009, 06:14 PM) *
QUOTE (Matt Ottinger @ Nov 1 2009, 02:52 PM) *
I agree with the contingent that says $10 per point as a consolation prize in 2009 is perfectly reasonable. Among other things, it makes the math easier for both host and viewer.


Which was my argument for it from the get-go. Joe and Jane Schmo (have they tied the knot yet?) can tack on a zero to the end of a number, right?


Unless they're trying to convince America that "alligator" has three letters, I would say there's still hope.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Zager
post Nov 7 2009, 12:08 PM
Post #16





Group: Members
Posts: 344
Joined: 19-June 03
From: Westland, MI
Member No.: 156



QUOTE (Matt Ottinger @ Nov 1 2009, 03:52 PM) *
I agree with the contingent that says $10 per point as a consolation prize in 2009 is perfectly reasonable. Among other things, it makes the math easier for both host and viewer.

Either that, or they should just have a "House Minimum" like on Wheel.

Of course, if second place contestants on Jeopardy! receive $2,000 cash, the highest payout on FF, if $10 per point, would be $1,990. All in all, I agree that it is "reasonable!"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fedya
post Nov 7 2009, 03:25 PM
Post #17





Group: Members
Posts: 886
Joined: 17-June 03
Member No.: 37



The "house minimum" is what turning the points from the front game into dollars is for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr. Armadillo
post Nov 9 2009, 10:36 AM
Post #18


Just found out how to add a title.


Group: Members
Posts: 397
Joined: 1-August 07
Member No.: 4561



QUOTE (wheelloon @ Nov 6 2009, 05:14 PM) *
QUOTE (Matt Ottinger @ Nov 1 2009, 02:52 PM) *
I agree with the contingent that says $10 per point as a consolation prize in 2009 is perfectly reasonable. Among other things, it makes the math easier for both host and viewer.


Which was my argument for it from the get-go. Joe and Jane Schmo (have they tied the knot yet?) can tack on a zero to the end of a number, right?


Disagrees.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wheelloon
post Nov 9 2009, 03:30 PM
Post #19





Group: Members
Posts: 289
Joined: 3-December 04
Member No.: 1251



QUOTE (Mr. Armadillo @ Nov 9 2009, 10:36 AM) *
QUOTE (wheelloon @ Nov 6 2009, 05:14 PM) *
QUOTE (Matt Ottinger @ Nov 1 2009, 02:52 PM) *
I agree with the contingent that says $10 per point as a consolation prize in 2009 is perfectly reasonable. Among other things, it makes the math easier for both host and viewer.


Which was my argument for it from the get-go. Joe and Jane Schmo (have they tied the knot yet?) can tack on a zero to the end of a number, right?


Disagrees.

Touche. +1 for you...

Oh my, I suddenly feel very depressed now... :'(
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 04:46 AM