![]() ![]() |
May 26 2009, 11:13 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 876 Joined: 16-February 05 From: Matteson, IL Member No.: 1334 |
I'm thinking it could be $20K still, but with a $10K bonus for all five top answers.
Up to $30,000? Does this mean that the Bullseye/Bankroll round comes back? How well did this work out for Feud last time? I'm probably in the minority, but I actually liked the Bullseye game. |
|
|
|
May 26 2009, 11:34 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Admiral Anaheim, Big Joey Numbers, & the Czar of Russian Rou Group: In the Biz Posts: 263 Joined: 19-June 03 From: Anaheim, CA Member No.: 149 |
I'm thinking it could be $20K still, but with a $10K bonus for all five top answers. Up to $30,000? Does this mean that the Bullseye/Bankroll round comes back? How well did this work out for Feud last time? I'm probably in the minority, but I actually liked the Bullseye game. On the contrary, sir. I was a mark for the Bullseye round myself. I thought itmade for a good warm-up to the Feud itself. |
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 12:12 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 459 Joined: 13-December 06 From: Lincoln Park, Chicago Member No.: 2486 |
I like the Bullseye round; however, I didn't care for the scoring system of the main game necessitated by its addition.
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 12:33 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1644 Joined: 14-August 06 From: Flint, MI Member No.: 1956 |
I don't think the pacing of the show would be hurt if they added the Bullseye. The way it's set up now, the first segment is rounds one and two, second is double points round three, third is triple points round four and five, if needed and the fourth segment is Fast Money (which sometimes begins in segment three if the game is won in three rounds.) Make segment one Bullseye plus round one, segment two round two and segment three rounds three and four. Make sure the "only read once, three seconds" rule is always invoked in round four and try to use surveys with more points and fewer answers in that round to avoid going to a rushed round five.
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 12:50 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1405 Joined: 21-August 03 From: St Louis Member No.: 350 |
Sodboy13 expressed my thoughts on the Bullseye round to a T.
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 02:43 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1743 Joined: 27-January 04 Member No.: 626 |
I wouldn't mind a Bullseye format to start. In order for a family to play for the max $30K pot, start them with a bankroll of $15K. Each question adds money to the roll($1K, $2K,... up to $5K), As Chad mentioned, switch some of the rounds around & the pacing won't be adversely affected with some minor tweaks.
|
|
|
|
May 27 2009, 07:06 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 856 Joined: 17-June 03 Member No.: 9 |
I think there would be a MAJOR issue with timing if they reintroduced the Bullseye game, and as it is, they barely have time to play 4 full rounds plus a quick "sudden death" round. If you notice in the early Karn eps. that introduced the 300 point format, there's a LOT of noticeable editing.
Having Bullseye means sacrificing one round of a regular game... on the Combs version and later Dawson version, they played single, double, triple, and one more triple. With today's timing, they'd probably play 3 rounds a la the "Celeb Family Feud", but with single, double, and triple to be sure that the game is decided on the 3rd round. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 06:29 AM |